Skip to content
Bold Observer

The Iconic Puzzle Game Couldn't Triumph at The Game Awards — An Additional Classification Could Fix That

Whenever a significant prize-giving event draws close, one notices an outcry for the addition fresh award types to recognize overlooked contributions and delight the hearts of fans dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator previously argued for a horror game category. That would be fantastic. The same goes for board games, which is someone's personal cause. Yet I need to apologize in advance if I try to elbow in front because like all single-minded supporters, I possess a compelling case backing this proposal is the most urgent and significant. The demand is this: We need an award type for logic-based games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Categorizing art by genre isn't exact; it remains highly personal, and typically start arguments and end in fuzzy definitions. This explains why movie academies steer clear of genre categories. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise within the realm of gaming, that demonstrate such variety they barely qualify a single creative category.

To recognize the complete range of interactive entertainment excellence to gain proper attention, and to ensure all game types to receive proper recognition, specific award classifications remain vital.

Existing Game Classification System

Leading game ceremonies offer these award types recognizing Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Together, these six categories effectively encompass many game types, making space possible for numerous titles.

Not so for logic-based experiences. There’s simply nowhere to put them. Think about these recent excellent titles, showing diverse approaches: structural challenges in a particular game, the pulse-pounding block-matching of another game, thought-provoking social scenarios from additional release. What category would fit them within current classifications? Unfortunately, nowhere.

The Representation Problem

Many instances occur excellent brain-teasers launched regularly without proper recognition in entertainment awards, if they accidentally match award groups including Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested small studio competitions.

  • One classic puzzle game wasn’t nominated in any category during that awards season
  • A different innovative game missed out in 2019
  • Well-received sorting experience got ignored recently
  • Limited numbers of logic titles barely qualified for small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're modest productions, yet the craft of the puzzle game is of massive significance. Famous handheld logic titles rank among most engaged experiences in the world and have been for many years.

The legendary block-stacking game rivals popular creative games for the title of highest-selling title ever; it additionally competes as greatest title ever. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks for gaming as medium, while interacting across multiple categories.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Logic titles wouldn't face this problem. It would be easy to populate multiple candidates with fascinating, diverse, deserving games each ceremony simply — or rather, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave so many good games out.

Restating the point, these represent titles lacking appropriate categories during prominent ceremonies. Puzzle game makers function at the challenging frontier interactive creation, creating some of most fundamental forms within interactive entertainment. Just like film action specialists, they warrant appreciation. We shouldn't delay decades.

By

Becky Foster

A seasoned journalist with over 15 years of experience covering European affairs and global markets.

Bold Observer

Type to search articles.